Just to try to be helpful ... On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 2:54 AM, Bob Briscoe <[email protected]> wrote:
> John, > > On 19/02/16 18:23, John Leslie wrote: > >> Bob Briscoe <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I'm cross-posting 'cos this impacts 3 IETF WGs and interested >>> implementers. >>> >>> We would like to propose a Bar BoF at the Buenos Aires IETF, about L4S, >>> DualQ and solutions to the TCP Prague Requirements. >>> >> This feels like it belongs as a non-WG-forming formal BoF. >> >> It describes work spanning at least three WGs; and could benefit from >> formal scheduling to avoid conflicts with those WGs and others. >> >> OTOH, it really isn't to the point where a WG charter can reasonably >> be drafted. First we must decide whether the work _can_ be split among >> existing WGs. >> >> However this may turn out, I wish to participate remotely. >> > OK, we'll see if the secretariat can help us with that. > I believe that happens at http://www.ietf.org/meeting/amreq.html. If you put "TSV" in as "type of meeting", your happy TSV ADs would see the request. Thanks, Spencer > Unfortunately we ran out of time for the formal BoF deadline on Friday. > > > Bob > > >> -- >> John Leslie <[email protected]> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> tcpPrague mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpprague >> > > -- > ________________________________________________________________ > Bob Briscoe http://bobbriscoe.net/ > >
_______________________________________________ aqm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
