Did this get scheduled? --aaron
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Spencer Dawkins at IETF < [email protected]> wrote: > Just to try to be helpful ... > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 2:54 AM, Bob Briscoe <[email protected]> wrote: > >> John, >> >> On 19/02/16 18:23, John Leslie wrote: >> >>> Bob Briscoe <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I'm cross-posting 'cos this impacts 3 IETF WGs and interested >>>> implementers. >>>> >>>> We would like to propose a Bar BoF at the Buenos Aires IETF, about L4S, >>>> DualQ and solutions to the TCP Prague Requirements. >>>> >>> This feels like it belongs as a non-WG-forming formal BoF. >>> >>> It describes work spanning at least three WGs; and could benefit from >>> formal scheduling to avoid conflicts with those WGs and others. >>> >>> OTOH, it really isn't to the point where a WG charter can reasonably >>> be drafted. First we must decide whether the work _can_ be split among >>> existing WGs. >>> >>> However this may turn out, I wish to participate remotely. >>> >> OK, we'll see if the secretariat can help us with that. >> > > I believe that happens at http://www.ietf.org/meeting/amreq.html. If you > put "TSV" in as "type of meeting", your happy TSV ADs would see the request. > > Thanks, > > Spencer > > >> Unfortunately we ran out of time for the formal BoF deadline on Friday. >> >> >> Bob >> >> >>> -- >>> John Leslie <[email protected]> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> tcpPrague mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpprague >>> >> >> -- >> ________________________________________________________________ >> Bob Briscoe http://bobbriscoe.net/ >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > tcpm mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm > >
_______________________________________________ aqm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
