Folks,
We have a time and room for this Bar BoF:
Date/time: 09:00 - 10:00 ART (= 12-13:00 UTC) Thu 7 Apr 2016
Room: Quebracho B
We have the regular IETF remote attendance facilities in that room.
The room is not being used for the following session, so we don't have
to vacate early.
We're building the agenda - will send shortly.
We want to allow most time for people to talk from the floor.
The general structure will be:
* Introduction/Background
* Clarification Questions
* Recent Activity: Design / Evaluation / Industry
* Build a standardisation roadmap
* Build a BoF for the Berlin timeframe, and should it be non-WG forming.
* Discussion / Q&A
Sorry for delay setting this up. My fault.
I've bcc'd a few people who have been asking about this specifically.
Bob
On 30/03/16 21:13, Aaron Falk wrote:
Did this get scheduled?
--aaron
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Spencer Dawkins at IETF
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
wrote:
Just to try to be helpful ...
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 2:54 AM, Bob Briscoe <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
John,
On 19/02/16 18:23, John Leslie wrote:
Bob Briscoe <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I'm cross-posting 'cos this impacts 3 IETF WGs and
interested implementers.
We would like to propose a Bar BoF at the Buenos Aires
IETF, about L4S,
DualQ and solutions to the TCP Prague Requirements.
This feels like it belongs as a non-WG-forming formal BoF.
It describes work spanning at least three WGs; and
could benefit from
formal scheduling to avoid conflicts with those WGs and
others.
OTOH, it really isn't to the point where a WG charter
can reasonably
be drafted. First we must decide whether the work _can_ be
split among
existing WGs.
However this may turn out, I wish to participate remotely.
OK, we'll see if the secretariat can help us with that.
I believe that happens at http://www.ietf.org/meeting/amreq.html.
If you put "TSV" in as "type of meeting", your happy TSV ADs would
see the request.
Thanks,
Spencer
Unfortunately we ran out of time for the formal BoF deadline
on Friday.
Bob
--
John Leslie <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
_______________________________________________
tcpPrague mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpprague
--
________________________________________________________________
Bob Briscoe http://bobbriscoe.net/
_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm
_______________________________________________
aqm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
--
________________________________________________________________
Bob Briscoe http://bobbriscoe.net/
_______________________________________________
aqm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
