Bernie,
L.D wrote:
>>Thomas is correct.
>No, he's not ;-)
Yes, we is! };>
>>The only limit on number of files in cache that Michael has in the
>>software is a top limit of 256 on the *report* of number of files in
>>cache. <G>
>I'm sorry but when I've used Arachne the limit has been 256 items in the
>cache directory. You'll need to double that value for the .htp files as well.
Be honest. Have you ever gone outside Arachne, and counted the
entries in Cache directory? I more or less have .. since Norton
Commander makes it very easy for me to see just how many files are in
there. Nothing has ever automatically removed those files. Now, I
*haven't* counted the number of entries in cache.idx file ... *that* may
be what's limited to 256 entries. I'll have to remember to check it
some day. <G>
>To me it removes the older files as new come in after getting over 256 files.
I don't know how it does it, if it does. Even using the "expiry" stuff
[which I have avoided since it expired all the "wrong" stuff and kept
all the "wrong" stuff as far as I was concerned] may not actually limit
the number of files.
I'm gonna save this, and then go back to a search I was on. Then I'll
check entries in index & actual files in cache.
l.d.
-- Arachne V1.60;b1, NON-COMMERCIAL copy, http://arachne.cz/
