On Sun, 19 Mar 2000 12:03:50 +0100 (CET) Richard Menedetter wrote:

> Hi

> "Samuel W. Heywood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> SH> I've never used MS-DOS 6.22.  You have just now given me another good
> SH> reason not to ever try it.  I've never heard anything good about
> SH> MS-DOS 6.22.

> And I never heared anything bad about it, and used it for years.

> I had no real problems with it, but I had bad problems with novell and
> drdos.

> What bad have you heared about it ??

1. That it leaves too large a footprint in memory.

2. That it has some built-in disk-compression utility (which, BTW, the user
may elect not to use) that wreaks all kinds of havoc.  The fact that such
poorly written software was ever released scares me away from it.  I don't
even care that some patches might have been developed later to deal with the
problem.  The problem was just so terribly serious that the software should
never have been released in the first place.

> What statements do _NOT_ work for you in win95 config.sys/autoexec.bat ??

I said that it has been so long since I played around with it that I forgot
what works and what doesn't.  Memory leak (vbg).

Sam Heywood
-- This mail was written by user of Arachne, the Ultimate Internet Client

Reply via email to