Clarence Verge wrote:
>
> On Wed, 15 Mar 2000 20:52:29 -0500, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
>
> > So, the "3.5 sec to paint the screen" is not an Arachne problem after-all.
> > It was due to the fact that you were using "inferior hardware".<vbg>
>
> Well, there may be another way to look at it. If Windows+Netscape can
> paint the same screen on the same hardware in 0.35 sec. then something
> might be inferior all right.
>
> Damn. Why can't we HAVE our cake and _eat_ it too !
We could ALL do with a little less echo. That reply was sent out Mar. 15.
Can't Linux be convinced not to send out random messages from a week ago ??
- Clarence Verge
--
- Help stamp out FATWARE. As a start visit: http://home.arachne.cz/
--
