Ricsi wrote: > GM> Result of my test at http://www.swichboard.com/ > GM> (no problems at-all) > >I _hate_ that everything works for you :-))))) <eg> Don't we all ;) >(IMHO it is because you have disabled frames, and I have enabled it) I can give another site that will generate a fault with frames (or atleast did for me with both 1.60b1 and 1.61). It's a very interesting graphics effect. The site in question uses frames in a non-valid way. (cols=*,500,100,* IIRC) The site in question? http://www.suntech.fr/ - the company where Michael recently was working... (I hope that's the address, I used their IP number which I've now forgotten) Anyway, perhaps something like this is done on the switcboard site? (I haven't been there). //Bernie http://bernie.arachne.cz/ DOS programs, Star Wars ...
- Memory Allocation Error v. 1.60b2 Richard Menedetter
- Re: Memory Allocation Error v. 1.60b2 Clarence Verge
- Memory Allocation Error v. 1.60b2 Richard Menedetter
- Re: Memory Allocation Error v. 1.60b2 Clarence Verge
- Re: Memory Allocation Error v. 1.60b2 Kali McLaughlin
- Re: Memory Allocation Error v. 1.60b2 Roger Turk
- Re: Memory Allocation Error v. 1.60b2 L.D. Best
- Memory Allocation Error v. 1.60b2 Roger Turk
- Re: Memory Allocation Error v. 1.60b2 Samuel W. Heywood
- Re: Memory Allocation Error v. 1.60b2 Bernie
- Re: Memory Allocation Error v. 1.60b2 L.D. Best
- Re: Memory Allocation Error v. 1.60b2 L.D. Best
- Re: Memory Allocation Error v. 1.60b2 Glenn McCorkle
- Re: Memory Allocation Error v. 1.60b2 Glenn McCorkle
- Re: Memory Allocation Error v. 1.60b2 Clarence Verge
- Re: Memory Allocation Error v. 1.60b2 Samuel W. Heywood
- Re: Memory Allocation Error v. 1.60b2 Bernie
- Re: Memory Allocation Error v. 1.60b2 Glenn McCorkle
- Re: Memory Allocation Error v. 1.60b2 Roger Turk
