I think that, in some ways, 1.61 has been flakier for me than the
60 betas. But I also think that with my configuration, where I don't
have to load any packet driver into conventional, I may have more memory
available -- on average -- than many. All I can do is report what I
find. :|
I went to the SunTech site -- and yes, frames are done wrong on one side
but work on the other. But I had no problems with memory. No problem
switching from French to English version of the page either.
I checked, and as I was loading the first page in French, I had 124K
conventional memory according to Arachne.
Setup is for Frames Yes, Virtual Screen No, xSwap memory requirements
at default values, Cache2Temp, Temp on RAMdrive.
l.d.
====
On Sun, 16 Apr 2000 08:09:37 +0200 (MET DST), Bernie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can give another site that will generate a fault with frames (or atleast
> did for me with both 1.60b1 and 1.61). It's a very interesting graphics
> effect. The site in question uses frames in a non-valid way.
> (cols=*,500,100,* IIRC)
> The site in question? http://www.suntech.fr/ - the company where Michael
> recently was working... (I hope that's the address, I used their IP number
> which I've now forgotten)
--
-- Arachne V1.61, NON-COMMERCIAL copy, http://arachne.cz/
