On 26 Aug 2000, at 18:35, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> >> Because this tag....
> >> <meta HTTP-EQUIV="refresh" content="60">
> >> is written incorrectly.
IMHO this tag is correct.
This is similar to the bug that is (was?) present in <form>'s that
didn't have an ACTION. (Supposed to go back to itself, so you
could rename the script and it will still work)
> Yet another HTML tag which Arachne must now handle "incorrectly" if we
> are to have "browser compatibility". ;-)
AFAIK There is no correct way to interpret the meta http-equiv,
since its not part of any HTML spec. I don't know enough http to
tell if this is legal in the http header. (ie put "Refresh: 60" along with
the "Content-type: text/html")
--
Ben Hood
http://i.am/hoody
