Folks,
Who is going to grab that open source and go to work on it?? I already
have a scheme in mind that should write long-name files in a manner
which would allow InSight to name each in a unique manner, or at least
each on a single message. Have a couple of possible ways to do it
in mind actually.
But for me to test anything the source would need to be ported
to pure ANSI C and the turbos and plusses gotten rid of -- else I can
neither understand nor compile it.
l.d.
On Sun, 26 Nov 2000 22:11:38 +0100 (CET), Michael Polak wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Nov 2000, Clarence Verge wrote:
>> the attachments are the same - they have the same Arachne file # - but
>> the main messages are different.
>> This occurs with A1.62, A1.66, and A1.67.
>> Here is the kicker: If I clear cache and reload inbox (M) and select a
>> message with attachment, whichever message I select first determines
>> what attachment I see for the messages selected later.
> Insight won't create them. Insight is crap and needs rewrite, this is why
> released it as open source ;-)
--
Join B'FOR - B'mothers For Open Records
<a href=" http://www.b-for.org "> B'FOR web site</A>
[Associate members of triad also welcome; membership confidential.]
Every member counts! We need numbers to produce valid statistics.
*******
A proud member of
<A HREF="http://www.phenomenalwomen.com/"> Phenomenal Women Of The Web</a>
-- Arachne V1.67, NON-COMMERCIAL copy, http://arachne.cz/
