One of the alternate CORE.EXEs doesn't have support for hi-color and so forth. The result is supposed to be something like 30K less memory usage. Well, my 9 meg system can work with the less fancy version, since it doesn't do hi-color and such anyway-- but what difference does it make? I mean, if I'm not getting "out of memory" errors with the regular version, is there any advantage to the "light" version, like running noticeably faster or something? Gil
- Re: Alternate COREs? Gil Parrish
- Re: Alternate COREs? Clarence Verge
- RE: Alternate COREs? Gil Parrish
- Re: Alternate COREs? Dale Mentzer
- RE: Alternate COREs? Gil Parrish
