Dale Menzier wrote:
>The 256 color CORE.EXE APM is the reason I am still using v1.66
>(there is no alternate CORE.EXE for 1.67) as well as the maximum
>memory MMCORE.EXE APM on my Arachne XT box. Theoretically you should
>have fewer problems with memory issues as Arachne needs as much low
>memory as possible. Since I seldom run the default CORE.EXE I cannot
>say much about how much superior or inferior the 256 colore CORE.EXE
>is, but I like it fine. HTH.
I'll stick with 1.67 unless Clarence's Alt-M procedure indicates I have a
memory problem. But it sounds like 1.66 is a decent enough release to fall
back on if I really need to; thanks for the info.
