RE: http://disvr.cjb.net/dos/dls.html

[Gil Parrish]

Thomas Mueller wrote:
>But FAT32 may be headed for obsolescence in favor of NTFS
>since MS's next Windows, both consumer and business versions,
>will be built on NT.  So I have one more reason not to
>bother with FAT32.

Just a comment here.  When they released Windows 2000, Microsoft was already
telling the business community that Win95/98 would not be upgraded again,
and they needed to start the transition to the NT line.  I think the user
community as a whole said--  no  --and hence we see the arrival of Windows
ME, built on the Win9x line.  So yes, Microsoft certainly wants to scrap the
Win9x line, and may even be telling folks (again) that they need to switch
to NT.  But if the user community still refuses to go there, we may yet see
ME2 or ME&YOU or whatever they decide to call the next upgrade of Win9x.