On Wed, 6 Dec 2000 00:55:50 -0500 (EST), Thomas Mueller wrote:
>> On Sat, 2 Dec 2000, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
>>> There exists only one "true DOS".... OpenDos v7.01
>> What about DR-DOS 7.03? I understand there wassome kind of
>> problem with 7.02, but didn't that get fixed with 7.03?
>> Or did they just leave things undone when they stopped
>> developing it?
>> IMO,
>> You hit-the-nail-on-head with that one. :(
>> v7.03 doesn't suck as bad as v7.02
>> But it still sucks! :(
>> --
>> Glenn
>> (your friendly neighborhood compu-nerd)
> OK, Glenn, if DR-DOS 7.03 still sucks, what DOS doesn't suck?
What DOS doesn't suck???
See the first line of my original message. <vbg>
> Surely
> DR-DOS 7.03 is better than MS-DOS 6.22.
Yes... but that's like saying "one broken leg is better that two". <g>
> What was so wonderful about
> OpenDOS 7.01? Was it better than DR-DOS 7.03?
Try tham both... then you'll see. <vbg>
> If DR-DOS is free for noncommercial use and sold for commercial use in lots of
> 50 or more copies, what about commercial use on from 1 to 49 computers?
Your guess is as good as mine.
I don't think that you would even get the same response twice from more
than one person at Lineo. :(
--
Glenn
(your friendly neighborhood compu-nerd)
http://arachne.cz/
http://www.delorie.com/listserv/mime/
http://freedos-32.sourceforge.net/
