On Sun, 3 Dec 2000 07:17:39 -0500 (EST), Sam Ewalt wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Dec 2000, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
>> There exists only one "true DOS".... OpenDos v7.01
> What about DR-DOS 7.03? I understand there wassome kind of
> problem with 7.02, but didn't that get fixed with 7.03?
> Or did they just leave things undone when they stopped
> developing it?
IMO,
You hit-the-nail-on-head with that one. :(
v7.03 doesn't suck as bad as v7.02
But it still sucks! :(
--
Glenn
(your friendly neighborhood compu-nerd)
http://arachne.cz/
http://www.delorie.com/listserv/mime/
http://freedos-32.sourceforge.net/
- Re: DOS footprints? Sam Ewalt
- Re: DOS footprints? Dale Mentzer
- Re: DOS footprints? Roger Turk
- RE: DOS footprints? Roger Turk
- Re: DOS footprints? Samuel W. Heywood
- RE: DOS footprints? Gil Parrish
- Re: DOS footprints? Clarence Verge
- Re: DOS footprints? ichi
- Re: DOS footprints? Roger Turk
- Re: DOS footprints? Samuel W. Heywood
- Re: DOS footprints? Glenn McCorkle
- Re: DOS footprints? Thomas Mueller
- Re: DOS footprints? Sam Ewalt
- Re: DOS footprints? Thomas Mueller
- Re: DOS footprints? Glenn McCorkle
- DOS footprints? sacha menge
- Re: DOS footprints? Clarence Verge
- Re: DOS footprints? Clarence Verge
- Re: DOS footprints? ichi
