Clarence
It needs to be a combination of html & images, otherwise those who are
"text only" because they have no choice would be unable to access the
pages.
Now, what does that have to do with writing the mods to handle ZBM on
all those other browsers??
:>
l.d.
====
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001 04:00:09 -0400, Clarence Verge wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Feb 2001 21:14:02 -0500, L.D. Best wrote:
>> Actually, I don't feel it is hopeless ... but it may be difficult as
>> !$@#$!@#!@#!@!@!
>> IF an add-on for NS could be made
>> &
>> IF an add-on for IE could be made
>> &
>> IF an add-on for OE could be made
>> &
>> IF an add-on for AOL users who have browser hidden below more layers
>> could be made
>> &
>> IF an add-on for any Linux graphics, X or whatever could be made
>> &
>> IF the people at ANY BROWSER could be gotten behind the fight ...
>> Then I'm all for it.
> Well, if THAT'S all then ...
> Will you accept full page transfer or do you want to stick with a mix
> of HTML and images ?
> On complex pages, full page is a major speed winner.
> On trivial pages (that don't exist anywhere except Virtual Arachne),
> straight HTML wins on speed. I think breakeven is about 16 sec load time.
> i.e. Arachne homepage downloads, builds and displays in about 1:10.
> The IMAGE of that page only takes 26 sec.
> My dial page downloads and displays in 2 sec.
> The image of my dial page takes 6 sec.
> - Clarence Verge
> - Still using Arachne V1.62 ....
-- Arachne V1.70;rev.3, NON-COMMERCIAL copy, http://arachne.cz/
