Ricsi wrote:
>We have to see the reality.
>Over 2 thirds of the internet users are using M$ Internet Exploder.
>That's a fact. (and the number is still _rising_)
This number is diffrent in diffrent countries. The numbers I've seen for
Sweden should make Netscape really really afraid (IE got 90% or so on some
sites, one site reported 97 or it may have been 98% as IE users).
However no matter what browser people use the webmasters shouldn't create
HTML (or Java or JavaScript) code that makes the other browsers unusable on
the pages.
>And to be honest IE is not that inferior.
>It implements most standards better than Netscape.
>(Not as good as Opera though)
A test I recently read in a paper complained that Opera was so bad on
following the standards ;-)
However the paper was wrong and Ricsi is right, although I find Netscape to
be better at sticking to the standard (altough my view on this is mostly
JavaScript related).
>IMHO the bigest problem is, that it's simply UGLY ...
>and I don't like the concept and the company :)
In my experience the biggest problem is the interface, not that it's ugly
(it may be I haven't looked) but it (the interface) feels limiting and
overly complex.
//Bernie
