So you don't waste any effort searching further, I'll tell up up front:
It is not the jpg files. Arachne has previously had no problem
converting them to BMP... like I said, I'd visited the site previously
and had no problems.
And, just to double check, I took a look at the files using GW and they
are just fine ... the same jpgs Arachne correctly rendered previously.
I'm not a happy camper. Software which isn't built by Microsoft should
not behave like it is "wearing out." :<
====
On Sat, 19 May 2001 09:02:26 +0200, Bernie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> L.D asked:
>> I have the same question ... and why is Arachne creating zero byte BMP
>> conversion files from JPGs?
> There's a small risk, I haven't checked if JPEG2000 (IIRC that's the name)
> is used yet. If it is I should be able to obtain a new version of
> djpeg32.exe (since it's used in almost all other programs).
> ....checking...
> Nope no new version out yet. I doubt it's the new JPEG standard then.
> Perhaps you can use djpeg32.exe directly on the JPG files in question,
> perhaps there's somehting wrong with them that djpeg32 might tell you.
> //Bernie
-- Arachne V1.70;rev.3, NON-COMMERCIAL copy, http://arachne.cz/
