Re: Down with windows

[Clarence Verge]

On Wed, 23 May 2001 07:56:13 +0200, Bernie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Not my version, but I wasn't involved much in the pre-1.6x development (in
> a good way anyway <G> - stay away from 1.50B1 and/or 1.50B2).

I'm disagreeable with that last comment.
Arachne 1.50b2 is one of the most stable there is and IMO is much
better than 1.50 src - the "src" ended up being a joke. <g>

A 1.50b2 is also a hell of a lot better LOOKING than later versions.

I use it on my '486 and I like it so much I don't want to upgrade it.

Question: Why are upgrades required to be tradeoffs ?
I mean, it seems to be the same in ALL software. You have to give up
something you value to use the newest versions. :(

- Clarence Verge
- Back to using Arachne V1.62 ....