On Wed, 5 Sep 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> twm has the reputation for being the smallest,
> but I ran it side-by-side against icewm, and
> icewm used fewer resources.
I notice I still have this hanging around:
-rw------- 1 steve stackman 282 Jan 10 2001 .ICEauthority
I guess I must have tried it. Obviously since I
remember little to nothing about it, I wasn't very
impressed...
> And icewm is surprisingly functional.
Apparently I didn't find it as functional as fvwm2.
;-)
> I've tried Blackbox, fvwm and fvwm2. It's no contest.
> Icewm has more bang for buck. (IMHO, of course.)
I've tried twm, olm, fvwm, fvwm2-95, Blackbox, ice,
and fvwm2...
and Enlightenment, and WindowMaker, come to think of it.
I still like fvwm2 (AnotherLevel/Lestiff look) so much
that I'd continue to use it even if it was twice the
size!
(Isn't Linux great... so many choices that
everyone can use what suits him best ;-)
- Steve
