On Mon, 21 Jan 2002 08:37:46 -0500, Sam Ewalt wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Jan 2002 15:34:48 -0500, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
>> DOS is not dead.
>> It's not even ILL.
>> DOS is ALIVE AND WELL.
>> There's even a 32bit version under development.
>> (D/L the testing version at the second link in my sig)
> Your optimism is almost contagious! But the most important application
> of alltime is not thriving in DOS, is it?
> As far as I know *none* of the DOS webrowsers were upgraded during the
> last year. Please correct me if I am wrong.
Arachne has been upgraded (several times), during the last year.
(have a look at the new versions of core.exe that I've done)
--- dir c:\asrc\!new>l:\new.txt ---
Volume in drive C is MCCORKLE_01
Directory of C:\ASRC170\!NEW
. <DIR> 9-16-01 4:03p
.. <DIR> 9-16-01 4:03p
090901 EXE 460384 9-09-01 9:58p
091001 EXE 460704 9-10-01 12:34a
091601 EXE 460720 9-16-01 5:17p
101901 EXE 460800 10-19-01 9:01p
120901 EXE 460864 12-09-01 8:02p
121101 EXE 460960 12-11-01 9:45p
8 File(s) 21159936 bytes free
___________________________________
These upgrades simply are not yet ready for release.
--
Glenn
http://arachne.cz/
http://freedos-32.sourceforge.net/
http://www.delorie.com/listserv/mime/
http://www.angelfire.com/id/glenndoom/download.htm
