On Fri, 14 Jun 2002 08:13:40 -0500, Sam Ewalt wrote:

> On Fri, 14 Jun 2002 01:05:26 -0400 (EDT), Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>> On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Thomas Mueller wrote:

>>> Is the Arachne list down?

>> Looks like it might be back up for a bit.

> I got nothing but email viruses all week long. Most had Arachne
> list paticipants spoofed as the "sender".

> Nasty business, eh? The volume of this crap is tremendous. Must
> be the continuing problem with the list--it keeps getting swamped
> with klez and variants.

> I don't really know what's happening, of course. But it is something
> weird.

I have been getting the same kind of garbage as you.  One of the
email addresses spoofed as "sender" was "[EMAIL PROTECTED]".
Maybe somebody filed some unjustified complaints against
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" and maybe some ISPs and some ORBS database
managers took some irresponsible action and blacklisted
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]".  I am receiving between four and six
KLEZ viruses every day.  All of them indicate a return path of
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" and they all bear IP numbers within
the same general range.  I asked my ISP to just blacklist the
offending IP numbers, but they won't do it.  They won't blacklist
anything unless it is in ORBS.  The reason why they won't blacklist
an offending IP number is that it might be an automatically
assigned IP number instead of a static IP number.  The next person
to log on to the ISP "first-trustees.com" might be a real person
with legitimate purposes, and he might get assigned the same IP
number as the virus propagator that was previously blacklisted.  I
think the best way to apply some effective restraints against the
virus propagators would be to track them down and fine the owners
of the offending computers.  It might cost a lot of money to track
down the culprits, but the expenditures can easily be made up by
all the fines that would be collected.  Also it would be a good
idea to outlaw Micro$oft Outlook and Outlook Express as unsafe
products.  If they can so easily outlaw "bad" medicines and "bad"
chemicals and "bad" tires and "bad" guns and "bad" baby seats, and
a lot of other "bad" things, then it ought to be a simple matter to
ban bad software.

Sam Heywood

-- This mail was written by user of The Arachne Browser - http://arachne.cz/

Reply via email to