On Sun, 10 Nov 2002, Richard Menedetter wrote: > >> Why are there no digi-cams with RJ-45 connector ?? > >> ftp://digi-cam/photo0001.jpg :-) > S> Ok, so after trying a few variations, I have to ask, > S> "What did you really mean to type?" > sorry ... this was meant as a joke ...
Ok... just that it isn't so far-fetched, what with all the talk of smart appliances that monitor themselves and call for service when necessary. A camera with a IP address isn't so far out there as to be an obvious joke. ;-) > I would want a digital-cam with a network interface. > and than you would give your camera an IP address, and could directly access > images with standard internet tools :-) > (so digi.cam would be an entry in my /etc/hosts like 192.168.1.3 digi-cam) Wait six months. You might have it. -- Steve Ackman http://twoloonscoffee.com (Need green beans?) http://twovoyagers.com (glass, linux & other stuff)
