Hi Laurie!
07 Dec 2002, "Laurie L Proud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
LP> Knowing that the standard defrag in dos or windoze does a half-hearted
LP> job, would it be safe to use the same programs on this windows 95
LP> machine as I use on the dos machines.
no
LP> The hard disk is NOT FAT 32 just split into a couple of logical drives
LP> using FAT16. I don't think the long file name support is on eather.
_every_ win95+ uses long filenames.
LP> I have Nortons SD and PC-Tools version 6 Compress
I don't think that defrag does a much worse job.
Generally defragmentation is generally overestimated.
LP> Thanks Laurie
CU, Ricsi
PS: numhandles is as necessary or not necessary under win95 as in DOS.
--
|~)o _ _o Richard Menedetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> {ICQ: 7659421} (PGP)
|~\|(__\| -=> Mr Worf, scan that ship! - Aye, Captain. 300 dpi? <=-
