Hi Bastiaan!
24 Dec 2002, "Bastiaan Edelman, PA3FFZ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
BF> Until a year ago my provider behaved likewise and only HTTP upload was
BF> possible. HTTP upload could not be done with Arachne since you had
BF> first to call a special page with a lot of WIZARDS... java script and
BF> all that nonsens.
HTTP upload can be used without any Javascript or anything.
BF> Until a year ago they made FTP possible and FTP is much faster, no
BF> bload at all...
FTP upload and HTTP upload do the same on a network view.
They send data over a socket.
If one is faster than the other than there is a serious quirk on either the
server or the client ... or both :)
BF> and files are smaller. HTTP is a 7 bit system
nope
BF> FTP is fast and uncomplicated
as fast as anything else.
And FTP is farest away from being uncomplicated.
It is a HUGE mess on the protocol level, and inherently insecure.
BF> Regards, Bastiaan
CU, Ricsi
--
|~)o _ _o Richard Menedetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> {ICQ: 7659421} (PGP)
|~\|(__\| -=> Help you out? SURE! Which way did you come in? <=-
