************ Small reply at bottom *************** On Mon, 23 Dec 2002 22:27:59 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Dec 2002 19:59:11 -0500, Glenn McCorkle wrote: >> Comments from Glenn below..... >> On Mon, 23 Dec 2002 04:40:09 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote: <snip> >> Sam, >> There you go 'throwing a monkey wrench into the works'. >> HTTP-upload is on my to-do list for version 1.73 ;-) >> Even if it is "unnecessary"...... >> It would be quite a nice feature to have as an option. >> (if it can be done without too much bloat)<g> > What is this "http upload", also known as the "browser upload" feature > incorporated into the unpopular bloatware browsers? Is it just a > mechanism for calling a routine compiled into the main browser program? > Is this routine nothing more than a quite ordinary FTP program that Bill > Gates probably stole from somebody else? The Micro$oft brainwashed > techies think that "http upload" or "browser upload" is something truly > different, and something that uses the latest and greatest protocols > that are needed for negotiating with all the web sites incorporating the > latest Micro$oft "standards". This is probably what they have been > instructed to believe. It sounds like something that would come right > out of the Micro$oft Training Doctrine. Nope. None of the above.<g> You may read-up-on-it here..... http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1867.txt -- Glenn http://arachne.cz/ http://www.delorie.com/listserv/mime/ http://www.angelfire.com/id/glenndoom/download.htm http://www.thispagecannotbedisplayed.com/
