On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Sam Ewalt wrote:

> On Fri, 3 Jan 2003 18:24:10 +0000 (UTC), Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
>
>
> > Thanks for telling me how amazingly simple and easy it is to navigate
> > Arachne in mouseless mode.
>
> > I just tried it out in off-line mode.  The Arachne graphics interface
> > is really very easy to use without a mouse.  I had previously
> > supposed that it would be very complicated and difficult, somewhat like
> > trying to go mouseless on another well known, but here unpopular, GUI
> > known as Window$.  Why didn't they design the Window$ GUI to work as
> > easily as the Arachne interface without a mouse?
>
> Actually Windows itself has keyboard equivalents for many functions
> but most people aren't aware of them. I don't know about the Windows
> browsers because I don't use them. And I don't know about more
> recent Windows versions, but I do know that prior to 95 Windows itself
> had keyboard equivalents and mouseless navigation.
>
I sometimes need to use a Window$ browser to do web sites that are
infested with JavaScript.  Now that my built-in pointing device on
my laptop no longer works, I am going to have one heck of a time
at trying to install a standard serial mouse for working under
Window$ because Window$ wants you to use the point-and-click GUI to
remove old hardware and to find new hardware and to install new hardware.
I can't point-and-click if my mouse is running wild and out of control.
There is probably a much easier way of doing these things simply by
editing some Window$ start-up files while under DOS, and before going
into Window$.  I don't know which files to edit and I don't know just
how they should be edited.  I would appreciate any help that someone
might be able to offer on how to solve this problem.  For working only
under DOS, it is so easy to uninstall a defective built-in mouse and to
install instead an alternative and functional standard serial mouse.
Window$ likes to make the simplest things soooo terribly complicated.

Sam Heywood
-- Message sent by Unix Pine, Version 4.44


Reply via email to