======= On 2003-02-28 at 19:02:00 L.D.Best wrote: =======

>Whether or not the story were true, I would feel far better if
>recognized "legit" sources provided the information on the purported
>crime or hoax, whichever it might be.

The Christian Science Monitor is still considered authorative and
non-partisan, isn't it?

Take a look at: http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/0906/p25s02-cogn.htm

Best regards,

Jake Young

2003-03-01  00:37:01 GMT




Reply via email to