Jake, that's the correct approach to take. :> ====
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003 0:38:10 +0000, J J Young wrote: > ======= On 2003-02-28 at 19:02:00 L.D.Best wrote: ======= >> Whether or not the story were true, I would feel far better if >> recognized "legit" sources provided the information on the purported >> crime or hoax, whichever it might be. > The Christian Science Monitor is still considered authorative and > non-partisan, isn't it? > Take a look at: http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/0906/p25s02-cogn.htm > Best regards, > Jake Young > 2003-03-01 00:37:01 GMT -- Arachne V1.71;UE01, NON-COMMERCIAL copy, http://arachne.cz/
