from Sam Heywood:

> I am still getting some spams about the illegal cable TV descambler.
> According to my understanding of the law, it is legal for someone
> to sell you some technical plans on how to make an illegal cable TV
> descrambler but it is illegal for you to make one and/or to possess one.
> The same applies for destructive devices and other illegal weapons.  You
> may legally publish and sell the plans on how to build them but it is
> illegal to make them and/or possess them.  In any case it illegal to spam
> people.

That cable TV descrambler ad claims it's legal, but naturally I have grave
doubts.  I don't know about the legality of publicizing technical plans for
destructive devices and other illegal weapons, but there would be the likelihood
of a visit by the FBI.

> It is illegal to send unsolicited bulk email.  Period.  Also it is illegal
> to promote a chain letter scam through the US Postal Service.  All chain
> letters are frauds and scams by legal definition.

Regarding that chain-letter pyramid scheme with the five reports for $25, the
message says it's legal, that they're selling something of value, namely the
five reports.  But it's still, to all intents and purposes, a chain-letter
pyramid scheme.

> I consider the porn scams and the viagra spams and the virile member
> enlargement spams and the breast enlargement spams as highly insulting
> because the spammer is making the preposterous assumption that his target
> audience suffers from a sicko psychological complex about about some kind
> of imagined sexual inadequacy.  The few and unusual people who actually
> do suffer from such imaginary hangups and problems need help from
> professional counselors.  There is no way a common low-life spammer can
> help them.

I do find those penis-enlargement spams funny in that people are expected to
really believe the message.  Funnier yet is that spam promoting a product
supposed to increase not only your penis length and thickness but also the
number of squirts you get when having sex.  People are expected to take that
seriously?

Reply via email to