To launch a war on a nation is a very serious matter and the evidence should be solid, very solid.
The evidence for weapons of mass destruction has been very soft and it still is. To present it to the American people (and the world) as hard core evidence is a lie. Making it an urgent matter, THAT pressing the US army could not wait untill the UN-inspectors ended their job, is making this a very big lie. Even if those weapons do exist... Iraq could not deliver them to the USA by the lack of carrying rockets. So there was never a great threat to the US. The lie is growing. There is still no evidence, there never was, about a connection between Al Quaida and Iraq. Next lie... If Sadam would have the possesion of WOMD... the US would not have attacked. Perhaps the fact they did attack is the best prove there are and were NO weapons of mass destruction. Any dictator threatened by the US is trying to get hold of weapons of mass destruction because this is the only way to have the Americans think twice... proliferation?? Americans are a curious people: backing an administration that tells lies, not one lie but many. Bringing democracy to Iraq or any other country can not start with lies and can not be enforced with guns. What good did this war based on lies... nothing (until now) What bad did this war do to the US... - costed a lot of money - costed many lives - friends are lost - goodwill is lost and who will believe the Bush administration when the next crisis arrives? Even Tony Blair will hesitate! Regards, Bastiaan . ************************* Technische Redactie CQ-PA Bastiaan Edelman, PA3FFZ ************************* Attentie: e-mail adres bij Wanadoo niet meer gebruiken! [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://home.hetnet.nl/~ba8tian/index.html -- Virusvrij e-mailen? => Arachne browser/mailer -- This mail was written by user of Arachne, the Ultimate Internet Client
