Roland Mainz writes:
> James Carlson wrote:
> > I'm looking through this one now, and I see a *lot* of confidential
> > materials, including discussions and agreements with third parties,
> > encumbered ABI documentation, and things of unknown origin.
> 
> I know...
> ... if you remove sections can you please add small comment like...
> -- snip --
> <section_removed title="agreement about patents"
> reason_for_removal="confidential" />
> -- snip --
> ..., please ?

I can note that something was removed, but in general, I can't tell
you what was removed or the specific reason for removal.  Those are
parts of the terms and conditions for the encumbered material.

The serious problem is that the useful parts of these cases are all
encumbered.  If you're a big fan of boilerplate and summaries, though,
then I've got your back.

In any event, I'll look into it.

> > I think you're looking at a time-waster.
> 
> Erm... I disagree.... even in a cut-down form the cases may give at
> least a "frame" of what is needed, which project state is required by
> the implemenmtors and may allow to give an esimation how long it may
> take to create such an ARC case...

If that frame takes more than a couple of hours' thought by someone
who understands the new architecture, then I'd say that there's
something quite seriously amiss.

-- 
James Carlson, Solaris Networking              <james.d.carlson at sun.com>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive        71.232W   Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757   42.496N   Fax +1 781 442 1677

Reply via email to