John Plocher wrote: > Glynn Foster wrote: >> So PSARC would be a relatively natural candidate for going completely public >> - >> or least enough to shift the non-public cases to a different ARC? >> >> Dare I say it, OSARC anyone? :) > > > Due to Sun's email security policies, the name will probably be > "PSARC-ext" to ensure that the fact that the mail is going outside of > Sun isn't forgotten by the sender...
I'm not sure I understand the rationale for it to continue to be a @sun.com alias - if the reviews are 95% likely to be open source, wouldn't it be more ideal to be @opensolaris.org, and encourage people to contribute there? Feels more open and more inclusive to me. Glynn
