Mark Martin wrote: > Well, thanks muchly for the help, folks. > > It appears that the good deed punishment continues. Apparently, > "opinion.ms" is an ignorable file. I can see I have clearly wasted all > that time learning how to work with the native template and tools of the > community. I could guess as to whether it's the full file name or > simply the extension which causes the behavior, but that's not exactly > an effective way to contribute (guessing at hidden requirements).
It is the content that causes the redaction, not the filename. AlanC has already indicated that. > I'll follow up with the website community to attempt to emancipate the > secret requirements. I've already explained to you why that won't be possible. -- Alan Burlison --
