On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Alan Burlison <Alan.Burlison at sun.com> wrote: > Mark Martin wrote: > >> Well, thanks muchly for the help, folks. >> >> It appears that the good deed punishment continues. ?Apparently, >> "opinion.ms" is an ignorable file. ?I can see I have clearly wasted all that >> time learning how to work with the native template and tools of the >> community. ?I could guess as to whether it's the full file name or simply >> the extension which causes the behavior, but that's not exactly an effective >> way to contribute (guessing at hidden requirements). > > It is the content that causes the redaction, not the filename. ?AlanC has > already indicated that.
He indicated that he fixed the whole-case redaction by neutering the offensive word in that file. The only thing wrong with the case now is that the work product that I have produced is now flagged as "ignored" (and therefore unavailable to me), as I clearly stated. It's state is no longer "case redacted". Or are you saying that "ignored" is the same as "case redacted"?
