Mark Martin wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Alan Burlison <Alan.Burlison at sun.com>
> wrote:
>> Mark Martin wrote:
>>
>>> Well, thanks muchly for the help, folks.
>>>
>>> It appears that the good deed punishment continues. Apparently,
>>> "opinion.ms" is an ignorable file. I can see I have clearly wasted all that
>>> time learning how to work with the native template and tools of the
>>> community. I could guess as to whether it's the full file name or simply
>>> the extension which causes the behavior, but that's not exactly an effective
>>> way to contribute (guessing at hidden requirements).
>> It is the content that causes the redaction, not the filename. AlanC has
>> already indicated that.
Mark's question is not about blocking materials containing the P word, but
about what file types get copied to the external site regardless of content.
> He indicated that he fixed the whole-case redaction by neutering the
> offensive word in that file.
And Glenn later clarified that it was his action that actually fixed it
- removing the opinion.ms- that also contained the P word before I'd looked.
I saw "opinion.ms- needs review" on the list and since I only saw the .ms
file in the directory, naturally thought that was the one needing cleanup.
I believe he also mentioned the skipping of the opinion.ms was by the ARC
request so they didn't have to go back and re-edit all the previous ones
with the P word in the comments. Perhaps you could ask him to rename this
one to a name the mirror script doesn't block. (case-opinion.ms? Opinion.ms?)
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith at sun.com
Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering
