Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:33:13 -0500
    From: Mark Martin <storycrafter at gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: [arc-discuss] Redacted case materials problem
            REVISITED

    On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 11:21 AM, James Carlson
    <carlsonj at workingcode.com> wrote:
    > The result is that simple mistakes like using the word "pro***prietary"
    > on an open ARC mailing list will result in having the case and all of
    > its materials marked as "redacted." ?Anyone outside of Sun who wants to
    > start making cases less available can just send a single email message
    > to shoot a case down.

    I bet that's it since the .ms has that language in some of the
    optional (but commented) sections.  I guess the survival skill to
    learn here is to sanitize the crap out of anything that might get sent
    there.  And since we're not meant to know the full list of words, I
    suspect common sense is the only guidance available here as to what
    words to avoid.

I think I know what happened, and it's my fault.  When Mark sent me
his (very well done) opinion.ms draft, I had to work on the formatting
of the interface table a bit and left the original behind as
opinion.ms-.  But although the redaction script is programmed to
ignore opinion.ms, it doesn't give opinion.ms- the same treatment, so
the "proprietary" boilerplate in that file triggered the clampdown.

I've removed opinion.ms-.  Let's see whether that unclogs the drain.

                -- Glenn

Reply via email to