Alan Burlison wrote: > As I'm sure everyone can understand, the need to protect Sun > confidential information has not changed. The objective has always > been to protect Sun's IP by trying to ensure that we are not releasing > confidential information. Because the final checks are automated, > there will always be a potential for false positives.
Alan, Thank you for the information you've presented -- it is much appreciated. It'd also be nice to know what the rules are for which files are ignored There's the list at http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/arc-faq/arc-publish-historical-checklist/, but it may be a touch out of date after the refactoring. I'd like to update the document there with a more accurate reflection of the current process. Thanks, Mark
