The redacted case list seems to have ballooned up again (roughly 200 cases now caught in limbo), and I noticed at least one odd thing among the entries.
See: http://arc.opensolaris.org/caselog/PSARC/2007/347/REDACTED.txt It's impossible to tell from the outside, but that one instance at least looks like a case where the "here's how you make a closed opinion if you need to" boilerplate information comments left in opinion.ms have caused the entire case to be redacted. Note that the opinion.txt file isn't flagged, which means that whatever "bad" stuff is in there, it's not actually part of the published opinion. I still think it should just be the one file that's affected by redaction (not the whole case), but why are we scanning and (apparently) attempting to publish the nroff sources anyway? I'd thought that they were among the ignored files. If there are any Sun-internal members who want to take a swing at the list, I'm sure it'll be appreciated by those of us outside. http://arc.opensolaris.org/caselog/unpublished_cases.html I'm pretty sure that 2006/017 and 2006/070 shouldn't be on this list. -- James Carlson 42.703N 71.076W <carlsonj at workingcode.com>
