Mark Martin wrote: > They were, but then I spent a week learning nroff and the ms format, > submitted a .ms file, and saw my hard work turn evil and rebel against > me. I'd prefer it if we allowed the nroff sources to be a way to submit > (and contain the original of) the opinion. I know some of the arcane of > the publishing now, so I know what /stuff/ to avoid in the documents. I > hope. > > I am in a constant state of battle selection, though, so if the best > approach is to let go of the nroff and move to ???, then I'll probably > concede and then push for some other markup format like HTML.
That should all now be fixed - you should be able to submit .ms files and see them appear externally. You should even be able to leave in the commented-out proprietary notices that come as part of the template, the scanner should now ignore them. -- Alan Burlison --
