On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 14:45 +0000, Ralph Corderoy wrote: > Hi Michael, > > > Perhaps then it's time to fork some stuff then. > > Can we avoid top-posting on this list please. > > > Perhaps there even needs to be some kind of fork - a pure version of > > ArcEm and a RISC OS enhanced version. > > That's a daft a reason as suggesting the Mac OS version should be a > fork, and the Windows one another. Different hardware configurations > can be emulated, with different support for particular OSes thrown in, > from one software base. The only reason for a fork in arcem I can see > would be a political one, and it would be to the detriment of all.
I didn't read Michael's mail like that. I read it as a suggestion to have a "Pure" verses "Useful" pair of forks, for people who want to keep things pure from the point of view of running things other than RISC OS under it. Perhaps I'm wrong. -- Rob Kendrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ arcem-devel mailing list arcem-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/arcem-devel
