On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 6:41 AM, Paul Mattal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Eduardo Romero wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Some users would think we should keep wine 1.0.x on extra since it is >> the stable version. Some users would disagree as many bugs will never be >> fixed in the stable 1.0.x tree and many features will not be added >> neither. I have suggestions: >> >> 1) wine 1.0.x in extra and wine-devel 1.1.0 and beyond which will >> provide and conflict with wine, as well in extra. >> 2) Latest wine version always in extra, as this is an evolutionary >> package, and people like to have the latest version of it. >> 3) wine 1.0.x in extra and wine-devel 1.1.0 and beyond in unstable. >> >> Please, add your suggestions, but I would like 1 or 2 to become the >> solution, I really don't like 3, since wine isn't unstable, just ever >> changing and adding features. > > I would support whatever decision you decide here, Eduardo. I'm generally in > favor of having a stable package in extra, but it might not make sense in > this case. > > I'd go with whatever you think makes most sense, and switch later if you > find it's not working.
I'll side with Paul on this issue. I like "stable" versions, but at the same time, I figure you know best - go with your gut on this one
