On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, Eduardo Romero wrote: > On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 11:05 -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote: > > > > > > I would support whatever decision you decide here, Eduardo. I'm generally > > > in > > > favor of having a stable package in extra, but it might not make sense in > > > this case. > > > > > > I'd go with whatever you think makes most sense, and switch later if you > > > find it's not working. > > > > I'll side with Paul on this issue. I like "stable" versions, but at > > the same time, I figure you know best - go with your gut on this one > > > Let's see if my guts gets me many complains. :-D Thanks for your > suggestions here guys, I went the always the latest wine version in > extra way. Hope it all turns out OK. >
Also, if you notice that a release has important problems and/or regressions, you can always decide to skip it and to wait for the next one. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
