On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 11:05 -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote: > > > > I would support whatever decision you decide here, Eduardo. I'm generally in > > favor of having a stable package in extra, but it might not make sense in > > this case. > > > > I'd go with whatever you think makes most sense, and switch later if you > > find it's not working. > > I'll side with Paul on this issue. I like "stable" versions, but at > the same time, I figure you know best - go with your gut on this one > Let's see if my guts gets me many complains. :-D Thanks for your suggestions here guys, I went the always the latest wine version in extra way. Hope it all turns out OK.
- Re: [arch-dev-public] Architecture rollcall Don Stewart
- Re: [arch-dev-public] Architecture rollcall Thayer Williams
- Re: [arch-dev-public] Architecture rollcall K. Piche
- Re: [arch-dev-public] Architecture rollcall Dale Blount
- Re: [arch-dev-public] Architecture rollcall Alexander Fehr
- [arch-dev-public] What should we do with the wine pa... Eduardo Romero
- Re: [arch-dev-public] What should we do with the... Allan McRae
- Re: [arch-dev-public] What should we do with the... Daniel Isenmann
- Re: [arch-dev-public] What should we do with the... Paul Mattal
- Re: [arch-dev-public] What should we do with... Aaron Griffin
- Re: [arch-dev-public] What should we do ... Eduardo Romero
- Re: [arch-dev-public] What should w... Eric Belanger
- Re: [arch-dev-public] Architecture rollcall Firmicus
- Re: [arch-dev-public] Architecture rollcall Hugo Doria
- Re: [arch-dev-public] Architecture rollcall Dan McGee
- Re: [arch-dev-public] Architecture rollc... Eric Belanger
- Re: [arch-dev-public] Architecture ... Aaron Griffin
- Re: [arch-dev-public] Architecture rollcall Jan de Groot
- Re: [arch-dev-public] Architecture rollcall Ronald van Haren
- Re: [arch-dev-public] Architecture rollcall Andreas Radke
- Re: [arch-dev-public] Architecture rollcall Tobias Kieslich

