Am Montag 06 April 2009 schrieb Dan McGee: > On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Tobias Powalowski <[email protected]> wrote: > > -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > > > >> Datum: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 11:02:42 -0300 > >> Von: Hugo Doria <[email protected]> > >> An: Public mailing list for Arch Linux development > >> <[email protected]> Betreff: Re: [arch-dev-public] Kernel > >> 2.6.29 series moved to testing > >> > >> IMHO we should wait for a .1 release (with the network fix) before > >> move this kernel to [core]. > >> > >> -- Hugo > > > > Network is fixed in -2 kernel, i try now if smack causes here freenx > > segfaults. building a -3 kernel withot smack no. > > > > before we start signoff we should get aufs working too. > > Running 2.6.29-4 on both of my machines and it seems to be stable, so > a psuedo-signoff for i686 and x86_64. > > Is 2.6.29.1 supposed to be in the repos? > > -Dan It is now in the repos, haven't run db yesterday. As long as aufs/unionsfs issue is not solved it cannot move in [core], i don't use any of those so some help here would be appreciated.
greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
