Thomas Bächler wrote:
Tobias Powalowski schrieb:
It is now in the repos, haven't run db yesterday.
As long as aufs/unionsfs issue is not solved it cannot move in
[core], i don't use any of those so some help here would be appreciated.
This is what I think we should do:
- Drop unionfs
- Apply aufs-standalone.patch from
http://git.c3sl.ufpr.br/gitweb?p=aufs/aufs2-standalone.git;a=tree;h=88c15502f9aed863f6f6fbb8104a9496b8f888cd;hb=88c15502f9aed863f6f6fbb8104a9496b8f888cd
(this is already the 2.6.29 version, and the patch does not do
anything bad, it only exports some functions which weren't exported
before)
- Now, it should be possible to compile aufs2 as an external module by
checking out the above repo and running "make".
- Build aufs2 utils which are also available on the same server.
I think Aaron agreed with me on that in Jabber. Opinions?
Problems: devtools and ISOs need to be moved from unionfs to aufs2.
How hard would it be to convert from using unionfs to aufs2 in devtools?
Allan
