On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 8:23 AM, Allan McRae <[email protected]> wrote: > Thomas Bächler wrote: >> >> Tobias Powalowski schrieb: >>> >>> It is now in the repos, haven't run db yesterday. >>> As long as aufs/unionsfs issue is not solved it cannot move in [core], i >>> don't use any of those so some help here would be appreciated. >> >> This is what I think we should do: >> >> - Drop unionfs >> - Apply aufs-standalone.patch from >> http://git.c3sl.ufpr.br/gitweb?p=aufs/aufs2-standalone.git;a=tree;h=88c15502f9aed863f6f6fbb8104a9496b8f888cd;hb=88c15502f9aed863f6f6fbb8104a9496b8f888cd >> (this is already the 2.6.29 version, and the patch does not do anything >> bad, it only exports some functions which weren't exported before) >> - Now, it should be possible to compile aufs2 as an external module by >> checking out the above repo and running "make". >> - Build aufs2 utils which are also available on the same server. >> >> I think Aaron agreed with me on that in Jabber. Opinions? >> >> Problems: devtools and ISOs need to be moved from unionfs to aufs2. > > How hard would it be to convert from using unionfs to aufs2 in devtools?
Very easy. Minor changes to the mount syntax
