On 18/03/12 22:08, Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 8:00 AM, Allan McRae <[email protected]> wrote: >> Now... has anyone proposing this actually done the work and noted which >> configure options get disabled when building gpgme against only one of >> gnupg or gnupg2. I remember there was differences when I was looking >> into this for the same request made back in 2010 >> (https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/22110). I can not remember the >> results, but I remember there was a difference. > > I tried building it only against gnupg2, and as far as I could tell it > made no difference. If I understood correctly building against gnupg1 > means that we don't get support for gpgms (at least). > > Dropping gnupg2 does not sound like a good idea, as that means people > would have to build a second verision of gpgme to get gnupg2 features.
I believe you can use make/optdepends there... > Furthermore, if we drop gnupg1, we could eventually drop it from the > repos all together, which would not be the case for gnup2 as it has > more features people might need. I think thet gnupg1 is more suited to what _ALL_ Arch systems use gpgme for. The simple verification of package signatures. Allan
