On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 19:26 +0100, Roberto Braga wrote: > Jan de Groot wrote: > > >I would like to have some information from qmail/vpopmail users: > >- What patches do you use or want to use? > > > > > net-qmail 1.05 basically is qmail 1.03 with the recommended patches > already included > > Beside them that are mostly to fix up bugs I would put in you attention > the following: > > http://www.shupp.org/ > The following patch are included: > > * smtp auth > * spf > * qmail-queue (to allow for virus scanners) > * maildir++ patch > * support oversize dns packets (not necessary if you use dnscache) > * chkuser (check for local vpopmail users, envelope syntax. requires > vpopmail to be previously installed) > * spam throttle > * qregex (regular expression matching in badmailfrom and badmailto) > * big concurrency (set the spawn limit above 255) > If you use the above take a look at the following > > Form netqmail page, at the end > Bill Shupp has put together a TLS + SMTP Auth patch specifically for > netqmail-1.05. Ted Fines has a patch which combines this with viruscan. > > A last note.... > http://www.nrg4u.com/ > New: silly qmail syndrome patch (Updated 20030105!), See graphs without > and with patch. > > It seem to be some kind of performance patch but on the site there are > no more information > > >- Do you use vpopmail with other MTAs than qmail? > > > Actually I do not use vpopmail but I plan to switch to qmail soon. > > Roberto
I've patched up a vpopmail that compiles without qmail installed and doesn't require root to build. It also installs in FHS way (yay! debian \o/). The chkuser patch requires vpopmail to be installed, what do we think of this? vpopmail qmail qmail-toaster (where toaster is the Shupp.org version) _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
