> On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 12:11:22 +0200, Richard Golier wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I remember there was some debate recently about (non)including >> documentation in packages. Shouldn't it be like when app has its >> documentation accessible through menu, should it be included in pkg? >> >> Gimp is one of the examples, when trying to access help from menu, it >> says /usr/share/gimp/2.0/help/en/gimp-help.xml is not present. In fact >> all the help/ dir is missing. Any chance it will be included one day? > > This is splitted as the gimp sources come without the help anyway. > pacman -S gimp-help-2 should help > but I dunno how uptodate it is > > -tobbi >
Um, there are examples of PKGBUILDs that utilize two sets of source tar balls to make up the one resulting binary package. In this case I think that is warranted. Very best regards; Bob Finch _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
